Did the Rolling Stones imitate the Beatles?
The Beatles and the Rolling Stones were famously treated as rivals in the press. Although they both helped to define an era of music, they were very different bands. Paul McCartney feels the Rolling Stones copied the Beatles.
How were the Rolling Stones different from the Beatles?
The Beatles were avatars of chic: the Stones were trad, dad. The Beatles were at the forefront of Merseybeat, whereas the Stones hailed from places like Kent, Middlesex and Cheltenham. The Beatles wrote virtually all their own material. The Stones second album is still 90\% all covers and it’s called Rolling Stones No.
Who was better the Beatles or the Stones?
While the Beatles maintained the shorter career span, the Rolling Stones were certainly the more prolific of the two bands. Some of the Rolling Stones best-known albums, including Sticky Fingers, Exile on Main Street, Goat’s Head Soup, Some Girls, and Tattoo You all came out after the Beatles broke up.
Who has more songs Beatles or Rolling Stones?
The Beatles put 72 songs on the U.S. Billboard Chart, including 20 number ones, and 14 other hits that made the top 10. The Stones have managed 56 chart hits, eight number ones, and 15 other hits that made the top 10.
Why the Rolling Stones are better than Led Zeppelin?
Both are very important, but Led Zeppelin was far more influential. The Stones pretty much have had the same sound throughout their 60 year career, but Zeppelin’s sound evolved and mixed folk and hard rock, and is still cited as an influence even though the band was only around a little over a decade.
Who sold more albums Beatles or Rolling Stones?
| ARTIST | COMBINED SALES TOTAL | |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | BEATLES | 22.1 MILLION |
| 2 | QUEEN | 12.8 MILLION |
| 3 | ABBA | 11.3 MILLION |
| 4 | ROLLING STONES | 10.1 MILLION |
Who came first the Beatles or The Rolling Stones?
Answer: The Beatles were officially formed in Liverpool in 1960, whilst The Rolling Stones were formed in London in 1962.
What did Mick Jagger say about McCartney?
Whereas we had a little more influences. There’s a lot of differences.” He added: “I love the Stones, but I’m with you. The Beatles were better.” Jagger, who described McCartney as “a sweetheart,” responded by saying: “There’s obviously no competition!” before continuing: “The big difference…