Should the US drinking age remain at 21?
More than 25,000 lives have been saved in the U.S. thanks to the 21 Minimum Legal Drinking Age. This law continues to prevent tragedies — decreasing crashes by an estimated 16 percent and keeping young people safer from many risks.
Why should the legal drinking age be lowered to 18?
Lower drinking age would allow for increased education, greater safety among young people, college students. If students were aware of their tolerance before entering college, they would be less likely to over-consume alcohol, which could lower the rate of crimes associated with alcohol consumption.
Why should the legal drinking age stay at 21?
Researchers from Boston University reviewed scientific literature published since 2006 and concluded keeping the legal drinking age at 21 reduces rates of drunk driving and crashes, and reduces rates of underage drinking.
Why lowering the drinking age is bad?
THOSE LOWER DRINKING AGES HAVE BEEN LINKED TO BAD THINGS, FROM TRAFFIC ACCIDENTS TO SUICIDE ATTEMPTS, AND NOW WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY ALCOHOLISM RESEARCHERS HAVE FOUND THAT THOSE WHO GREW UP IN STATES THAT HAD LOWER DRINKING AGES ARE MORE LIKELY TO BINGE DRINK LATER ON IN LIFE.
Why we should lower the drinking age statistics?
Lowering the drinking age would also reduce the number of alcohol-related accidents among underage drinkers. Many underage drinkers will not seek medical attention, no matter how severe injuries may be, because they fear the legal consequences of their actions.
Would lowering the drinking age cause more accidents?
Almost all studies designed specifically to gauge the effects of drinking age changes show MLDAs of 21 reduce drinking, problematic drinking, drinking and driving, and alcohol-related crashes among young people. Impact on industry: Lowering the drinking age to 18 will increase highway crash deaths among young people.
Why shouldn’t we lower the drinking age?
According to the CDC, lowering the drinking age could impair the brain’s development causing depression, decreased motor skills, or memory loss. One can argue that the earlier a person starts to drink, the more likely they are prone to developing alcohol related problems in life.
How does the drinking age affect society?
Lower minimum legal drinking age (MLDA) laws have been associated with short-term effects such as a greater number of traffic fatalities and teen suicides. Findings support an association with problematic drinking behaviors that persist into later adulthood, such as more frequent binge episodes.
Why shouldn’t the drinking age be lowered?
Punishments for underage drinking cause harm.
Why the legal drinking age should be 18?
Colleges and Universities often argue that the legal drinking age should be 18 because outlawing alcohol consumption in colleges for those under 21 is making the problem worse. These colleges and universities say that allowing alcohol consumption legally might help cut down alcohol related deaths in colleges.
Would lowering the drinking age help?
Lowering the drinking age would also reduce the number of alcohol-related accidents among underage drinkers. Many underage drinkers will not seek medical attention, no matter how severe injuries may be, because they fear the legal consequences of their actions.
Does the minimum legal drinking age save lives?
The minimum legal drinking age (MLDA) is widely believed to save lives by reducing traffic fatalities among underage drivers. Further, the Federal Uniform Drinking Age Act, which pressured all states to adopt an MLDA of 21, is regarded as having contributed enormously to this life saving effect. This paper challenges both claims.