Should I play Europa Universalis or Crusader Kings?
With Crusader Kings 2, you start anywhere between 1066 and 1337. With the right DLC, though, you can actually start as early as 769. Relatively speaking, Europa Universalis IV is a bit more modern. If you get a kick out of the medieval time period, CK2 is going to be your best bet.
What’s the difference between Europa Universalis and Crusader Kings?
In Crusader Kings 2, you play as a character and your in-game fate is tied to the dynasty of your in-game character. The game is also set during the Middle Ages. In Europa Universalis IV, you play as a nation and your in-game fate is tied to your nation, not your dynasty as in Crusader Kings 2.
What is the difference between Europa Universalis 4 and Crusader Kings 2?
Is Europa Universalis 4 a good game?
But overall, dropped players and crashes, commonplace in Crusader Kings and Victoria II, are refreshingly rare. Europa Universalis IV is a masterwork of a strategy game. It still has its rough edges, and convoluted underlying systems that will only be comprehensible to the most in-depth and experienced players.
Is euroeuropa Universalis IV an improvement over its predecessors?
Europa Universalis IV comes after a long line of grand strategies, three of whom are Paradox titles. It offers an improvement over the previous three iterations of the series, but it’s an evolution, not revolution. It’s also not an improvement in all aspects, EU2 and 3 had their own advantages that were axed with EU4.
Should I get CK2 or EU4?
Furthermore, CK2 is from around 1066 to 1453 while EU4 is from 1444 to 1821, a time period I find more appealing. The mod community of EU4 is also pretty damn nice. All that said, I never gave CK2 a proper try.
Is Crusader Kings II an improvement over EU2 and Eu3?
It’s also not an improvement in all aspects, EU2 and 3 had their own advantages that were axed with EU4. Crusader Kings II on the other hand is unique in that it’s a RPG-Grand strategy mix.