Is it OK to write bad code?

Is it OK to write bad code?

It depends how you define bad code, done code is always better than perfect. As others noted, some will write sloppy code blatantly for good reasons like being throw away, needs to be finished within an hour etc…

What makes a bad software developer?

Bad developers don’t take ownership of their code; they don’t actively seek to grow their abilities, they’re not curious about new horizons, and they’re unwilling to recognize and learn from their mistakes. Look for those traits in your team members, and it will lead you to your weakest software developers.

How do you deal with bad code that someone else has written?

The best way to do it is by asking questions and showing your colleague the respect you would want if the situation were reversed. By asking questions instead of immediately criticising their bad code, you prompt them to self-evaluate their coding practices.

How do you know if you’re a bad programmer?

Signs that you’re a bad programmer

1. Inability to reason about code.
2. Poor understanding of the language’s programming model.
3. Deficient research skills / Chronically poor knowledge of the platform’s features.
4. Inability to comprehend pointers.
5. Difficulty seeing through recursion.
6. Distrust of code.

What makes bad code?

The definition is: A bad code is when a programmer or coder do program to get things done faster without thinking much about future changes and ignoring the possibility of other developers touching the code. Hard to read and understand: The first characteristic of bad code is that nobody else understands it fast.

Does everyone write code differently?

Everyone codes differently. That’s why a piece of code might seem horrible to one person, but just fine to another. This is no problem when you’re working alone. But these days, a lot of software is built in collaboration.

What makes you a good programmer?

A great programmer is able to understand problems clearly, break them down into hypotheses, and propose solutions in a coherent manner. They understand concepts quickly, or ask the right questions to help make them clear, and don’t need to have everything written down in a specifications document.

What is the hardest part about supporting someone else’s code?

Working with someone else’s code The challenge: Trying to understand how a piece of legacy code works and divine the intentions of the original developer. This is even harder when that developer isn’t around and the code is poorly written, commented or documented.

How do you read a messy code?

What’s the best way to read and understand someone else’s code?

1. Find one thing you know the code does, and trace those actions backward, starting at the end. Say, for example, you know that the code you’re viewing ultimately creates a file with a list of movie titles.
2. Rinse and repeat.

How do I know if my software engineer is bad?

Signs of a bad software engineer

1. You can’t understand their code. In fact, nobody can.
2. They stop at the first solution. Bad programmers will check in their code at the very first solution that looks like it works.
3. They never follow established conventions.
4. They are egotistical.
5. They can’t compromise or let go.

How do I know if I am good at programming?

start a project work on that particular language and work on it. If your project is success then you are a good programmer. You should focus on the language that you learn and understand every concept then you should be a good programmer, and learn always new in that language or out of this.

Do you think programmers over-complicate their code?

1. Yes, I think sometimes. 2. Yes, at least some programmers at least some of the time over-complicate their code, at least some of the times intentionally. 3. Cases closed.

What do you think a good programmer avoids?

I think that a good programmer avoids overly complicated code. This includes avoiding the temptation to force a design pattern to fit into a solution that doesn’t really require it. It also includes avoiding God-objects, magic buttons, premature optimization, premature generalization, and other anti-patterns.

Why do people over-engineer software development?

1) Over-engineered because of premature generalization or trying to anticipate future needs that never arose 2) Developer(s) wanted to learn/experiment with a new design pattern or technology they’d not used before and shoehorned it in even when it was overkill.

What are some common reasons why programming languages get so complicated?

It might only be a small piece of duplication or tacking another flag argument onto a method but it all adds up. Effectively, hacks are added and it doesn’t take long for everything to get over-complicated due to all the code smells. This is the most common and usually just due to not knowing better or time pressure.