What does Descartes mean by “I think therefore I am?
Descartes argues that there is one clear exception, however: “I think, therefore I am.” [1] He claims to have discovered a belief that is certain and irrefutable. Perhaps there is no saying more famous in philosophy than this phrase, often known as the “Cogito” after its Latin phrasing, cogito ergo sum. [2]
What is the logical fallacy in Descartes’ I am?
The logical fallacy is in that René Descartes thought only in 1 person – himself. Also, his deductive result “I am” doesn’t provide further insight into anything. The statement has 2 parts,”I think” and “I am”. Descartes cannot logically conclude by going from one to the other that when thinks, there are others.
Is there a logical fallacy in ‘I think therefore I am’?
, Logical fallacies are lies wearing the corpse of logic. Originally Answered: Is there logical fallacy in “I think, therefore I am”? As with all things its relative to context. In this case the term “am” is specifically referring to the ability to do what is stated prior to it. So the context is being able to think means one exists.
Are there any logical contradictions in Descartes’ philosophy?
Logical contradictions are very limited in scope.Informal fallacies are more interesting (straw man, slippery slope, etc.), but there’s no sign of an informal fallacy here. The most successful arguments against whatever Descartes project was take issue with the content of the statement.
What did Rene Descartes believe in?
René Descartes (1596–1650) was a French philosopher and mathematician, credited as a foundational thinker in the development of Western notions of reason and science. His philosophy was built on the idea of radical doubt, in which nothing that is perceived or sensed is necessarily true.
Why didn’t Descartes further pursue the line of reasoning?
It is strange that Descartes did not further pursue this line of reasoning, as he would then likely have solved the problems of philosophy / knowledge. The reasoning is simple. 1. ‘Cogito Ergo Sum’ – I think therefore I exist (a thinking thing exists).
Do you have to exist to be deceived by Descartes?
Even if all the beliefs and types of beliefs that Descartes reviews are false, or could be false, at the least, he must exist to be deceived. Even if one doubts one’s own existence, one must exist at that moment, since there must be something, or someone, doing the doubting.