What are two reasons Plantinga offers for rejecting strong Foundationalism?
Reformed epistemologists reject classical foundationalism for two reasons: first, because it is self-referentially incoherent since the position is itself neither self-evident, incorrigible, or concerned with what is directly evident to the senses, nor is it entailed by beliefs that are, and hence does not satisfy its …
What is the Great Pumpkin Objection?
The Return of the Great Pumpkin objection concerns whether or not Plantinga has successfully shown that Christian belief is intellectually acceptable. This is achieved by showing that Plantinga’s method for defending Christian belief can be mimicked by those with clearly unacceptable beliefs.
Can religious belief be justified?
Evidentialism implies that full religious belief is justified only if there is conclusive evidence for it. It follows that if the arguments for there being a God, including any arguments from religious experience, are at best probable ones, no one would be justified in having a full belief that there is a God.
Is belief in God rationally justified?
Many epistemologists argue that it is reasonable to hold religious belief, and that belief in God is rationally justified. A growing number of philosophers affirm that the existence of God can be demonstrated or made probable by argument.
What does Plantinga say is wrong with classical foundationalism?
Plantinga’s second argument against classical foundationalism is that it is self-referentially incoherent. It fails the test of its own rules, which require that it be either self-evident, incorrigible, or evident to the senses.
What is the problem with foundationalism?
The major problem of foundationalism is the claim that some beliefs are self evident and infallible. What the foundationalist is trying to say here is that those beliefs that are infallible and self-evident are possible to exist without being justified.
What is epistemology in Christianity?
Biblical/Hebraic Epistemology as Covenantal. Covenant epistemology may be defined as a way of knowing that connects truth with life, that is, it recognizes that the purpose of the acquisition of knowledge is to engender obedience to the covenant that binds God and His people.
Is religion an epistemology?
Religious epistemology is the study of how subjects’ religious beliefs can have, or fail to have, some form of positive epistemic status (such as knowledge, justification, warrant, and rationality) and whether they even need such status appropriate to their kind.
What is meant by epistemology?
epistemology, the philosophical study of the nature, origin, and limits of human knowledge. The term is derived from the Greek epistēmē (“knowledge”) and logos (“reason”), and accordingly the field is sometimes referred to as the theory of knowledge.
Was Kierkegaard a Fideist?
Fideism (/ˈfiːdeɪ. Historically, fideism is most commonly ascribed to four philosophers: Blaise Pascal, Søren Kierkegaard, William James, and Ludwig Wittgenstein; with fideism being a label applied in a negative sense by their opponents, but which is not always supported by their own ideas and works or followers.
What is a parity argument in philosophy?
Plantinga’s parity argument for rational belief in God follows a specific pattern. The first goal is to highlight those beliefs that we take to be both rational and basic. In other words, it needs to be the kind of belief that is rational despite not being inferred from any evidence or argument.