Why is Emacs popular?
Emacs is popular because it’s incredibly powerful. You can make it do nearly anything. From text manipulation to playing games. You can rewrite the behaviours and add functionality (in lisp!) to do anything you want.
Who should use Emacs?
The best feature of Emacs is how easy it makes programmatically interacting with text. As programmers and sysadmins, we spend most of our day interacting with text on a computer. So having a platform for automating text interaction can save us a lot of time every day.
Is Neovim better than VSCode?
Neovim and Visual Studio Code belong to “Text Editor” category of the tech stack. “Modern and more powerful Vim” is the primary reason why developers consider Neovim over the competitors, whereas “Powerful multilanguage IDE” was stated as the key factor in picking Visual Studio Code.
Can Emacs be made more popular?
Any improvements to Emacs in that regard have numerous hurdles to overcome, however. There are technical questions and, naturally, licensing considerations, but there is also the philosophical question of what it is, exactly, that stops the venerable text editor from being more popular.
Is there an Emacs editor for Linux?
LWN.net is a subscriber-supported publication; we rely on subscribers to keep the entire operation going. Please help out by buying a subscription and keeping LWN on the net. The Emacs editor predates Linux, and was once far more popular, but it has fallen into relative obscurity over the years.
Is modernizing Emacs a waste of time?
But “modernizing” Emacs (however defined) is likely to be a waste of the project’s time, since its look is not what’s holding it back, Ahmed Khanzada said. For example: ” Terminal-based Vim is not like a modern application, yet is more popular than Emacs.
Should EMACs have a cosmetics mode?
Richard Stallman, one of the original authors of Emacs, seemed somewhat dismissive in his reply : ” Perhaps we should implement a mode that puts cosmetics on Emacs so it will appeal to those who judge by the surface of things. ” But Stefan Kangas thought there was more to it than that: