Should opposing views on a topic always be presented?
Introducing opposing viewpoints is necessary, but do not stop there. The burden of proof is on you, as the author of the argument. If you fail to neutralize a common objection, readers will have an excuse to reject your argument.
What does it mean to have opposing views?
An opposing viewpoint is a viewpoint that’s the opposite of your own, as a disagreement with someone’s opinion. If the author discusses those opposing views simply by attacking them with his own views rather than using facts and statistical data it’s “emotionally”.
Why is it important to anticipate and refute possible opposing views in your argumentative paper?
By anticipating the ways that your audience might disagree with you, you can work to refute opposing views and increase the effectiveness of your argument.
What’s an argumentative claim?
The argumentative claim is the foundation for an argumentative essay. It introduces the reader to the main argument you will be making about a topic or issue. A strong argumentative claim is debatable, focused, and clear.
What are some examples of opposing viewpoints?
For example, if your paper’s TOPIC is about whether people under 21 in Pennsylvania should be able to legally purchase alcohol and your CLAIM is that they should NOT be able to do so, the OPPOSING VIEWPOINT is, of course, that they SHOULD be able to purchase alcohol.
What opposing point of view admits the value of an opposing viewpoint but quickly pivots back to the writer’s side of the argument?
Concessions admit the value of an opposing viewpoint, but quickly pivot back to the writer’s side of the argument.
How do you start an opposing viewpoint essay?
First, present the opposing view. Next, present your own argument, clearly showing why you disagree with the opposing view. Finally, (perhaps most importantly) provide logical evidence that supports your rebuttal.
What are the 4 types of claims?
There are four common claims that can be made: definitional, factual, policy, and value.
Why is it important to take the perspective of opponents?
If a person cannot take the perspective of opponents, then his or her understanding of the issue is limited and incomplete. When people disagree, there needs to be a realistic assessment of common and opposed interests and conclusions.
What is the opposite of perspective-taking?
The opposite of perspective-taking is egocentrism or being unaware that other perspectives exist and that one’s own view of the situation or issue is incomplete and limited.
Why do people have different perspectives at different times?
The third is that people can have different perspectives at different times. As your job role, experiences, assumptions, physiological states, and values change, your perspective will change. When you are hungry, for example, you notice all the food in a room. When you are not hungry, the food tends not to attract your attention.
Why is it important to take perspective in a situation?
Once people can view the issue and situation both from their own perspective and the other persons’ perspectives, they can more easily find mutually beneficial solutions. Perspective-taking also communicates that one really understands their thoughts, feelings, and needs.