Is C++ Primer 5th Edition good?
When it comes to books, they quickly become outdated. And if you want to read C++ primer 5th edition, I highly recommend it, though the 4th edition was the last one I read. Also Effective Modern C++ is one of my recommendations. Best of luck.
Is C++ Primer still good?
> Is C++ Primer fifth edition now obsolete? No, it is still a good book to start learning C++ with. Most of the significant additions to the language are in the standard library; and you wouldn’t be needing those initially.
Is effective modern C++ still relevant?
The Effective C++ is still very relevant, and is not superseded by the new book.
Is effective modern C++ for beginners?
You should be able to read them in a couple of evenings. If you are a beginner to C++, effective modern C++ deals with new features of C++ which you might not appreciate, the other two books are more about general C++ issues and would be good for a learner to read.
What is C++ used for today?
C++ is one of the most widely-used programming languages in game development. It has been used to create: games, such as World of Warcraft, Counter-Strike, and StarCraft, game engines like Unreal Engine, and gaming consoles, including Xbox, PlayStation, and Nintendo Switch.
What are the benefits of learning C++?
Advantages of C++
- Portability. C++ provides this feature of portability allowing us to develop codes without caring about the hardware.
- Mid-level programming language.
- Object-Oriented.
- Multi-paradigm programming language.
- Memory Management.
- Fast and Powerful.
- Similar to other languages.
- Standard Library.
What is considered modern C++?
Modern C++ stands for C++ that is based on C++11, C++14, and C++17. That revolutions became with C++14 and will become with C++17 to an evolution.
What is C++ good for?
It is mainly used in applications and operating systems. The C++ language can be used for building higher-level applications with graphics libraries, applications to communicate with network devices and computer network simulators as well as remote device systems and network management.
Why should I learn C++?
Once you have learned it, it is relatively easy to switch to another language since a lot is shared across different object-oriented programming languages. All in all, if developing high-performance applications such as browsers or game engines interests you, C++ will be the best choice for you.
Why is C++ so important?
It is useful for the low-level programming language and very efficient for general purpose. C++ gives the user complete control over memory management. C++ has a huge community around it. Community size is important, because the larger a programming language community is, the more support you would be likely to get.
What is C++ best for?
Should I read the C++ Primer 5th edition?
And if you want to read C++ primer 5th edition, I highly recommend it, though the 4th edition was the last one I read. I would agree with Nathan. My recommendation would be to build a good foundation in C++11. 14 and 17 are much easier to catch later. One thing I really started using recently are rvalue references.
What is the best book to learn C++17 and C++14?
The features of C++14 adn C++17 are all very nice, but they are for advanced users, you need to understand the basics first, so the current C++ Primer will do fine. I would suggest you read “C ++ primer 5th edition” then if you want to know about C ++ 14 and C ++ 17 then you can read “Modern C ++ Programming Cookbook” by Maruis Bancila
What is the best book to learn C for beginners?
C: A Reference Manual (5th Edition)- Samuel P. Harbison and Guy R. Steele (2002). An excellent reference book on C, up to and including C99. It is not a tutorial, and probably unfit for beginners. It’s great if you need to write a compiler for C, as the authors had to do when they started.
Is there a good C style book?
However, the language has changed and good C style has developed in the last 25 years, and there are parts of the book that show its age. C: A Reference Manual (5th Edition)- Samuel P. Harbison and Guy R. Steele (2002).