Why did the 17th Amendment change the way that senators are chosen?
What changed with the 17th Amendment? – Originally, Senators were originally elected by state legislatures rather than by popular vote. – Framers set these requirements, as well as the longer terms in office, because they wanted the Senate to be a more enlightened and responsible legislative body than the House.
Why did the framers of the Constitution believe that the Senate would be more responsive?
Why did the framers of the Constitution believe that the Senate would be more responsive to national interests than the House? Senators were indirectly elected and served longer terms.
Does democracy make a country more or less egalitarian?
Democracy is an egalitarian form of government in which all the citizens of a nation together determine public policy, the laws, and the actions of their state. It requires that all citizens (meeting certain qualifications) have an equal opportunity to express their opinion.
Why are senators directly elected?
Voters have elected their senators in the privacy of the voting booth since 1913. The framers believed that in electing senators, state legislatures would cement their tie with the national government, which would increase the chances for ratifying the Constitution.
How are senators chosen quizlet?
Senators are now elected by popular vote in statewide elections, Only one senator is elected from a state during any given election, There are no limits on how many six-year terms a Senator can serve, Senate terms are staggered so that one third of them expire every two years.
What is one power unique to the Senate and why is the Senate responsible for carrying out that power?
What is one power unique to the Senate, and why is the Senate responsible for carrying out that power? Impeachment trials happen in the Senate. This is because each state has an equal number of representatives in the Senate, which gives states ultimate power over the presidency.
Why do most senators receive more public attention?
why do most senators receive more public attention than their colleagues in the house? because the Senate is smaller, therefore easier to notice individual members. senators are better at getting attention because of their longer terms and they represent a larger group of people.
What are the limitations of a democratic form of government?
Two limitations of a democratic government are: People cannot be removed or appointed as required. It has to follow a set of rules, and leaders keep changing in a democracy leading to instability.
What is the advantage and disadvantage of democracy?
⏩Democracy improves the quality of Decision Making. ⏩Democracy provides a method to deal with differences and conflicts. ⏩Democracy allows people to correct their own mistakes. ⏩In a democracy, people rule themselves as leaders are elected by them.
Why are quality decisions a possibility in a democracy?
Quality decision is possible in democracy because it constitutes working with institution and involve a lot of people through which drawbacks of a decision could be highlighted.
How does democracy include the quality of decision making?
Answer: Democracy is based on consultation and discussion. A democratic decision always involves many persons, discussions and meetings. Thus the lengthy process of taking decisions on any important issue in democracy improves the quality of the decision.
How do electoral systems affect the political life of a country?
The choice of a particular electoral system has a profound effect on the future political life of the country concerned, and electoral systems, once chosen, often remain fairly constant as political interests solidify around and respond to the incentives presented by them.
Can a state have wide discretion in establishing its own electoral system?
Even in the context of international law and standards, “States have, and must have, wide discretion to establish institutions in accordance with national and local conditions and requirements.” [i] As any other legal institution, electoral systems cannot be created or adopted in a blind way.
What can electoral systems do to avoid becoming unsustainable?
Electoral systems have to avoid turning themselves into unsustainable or unrealistic theoretical postures.
Do electoral systems aggravate or moderate tension and conflict?
It is clear that different electoral systems can aggravate or moderate tension and conflict in a society. At one level, a tension exists between systems which put a premium on representation of minority groups and those which encourage strong single-party government.