Why are the Hobbit movies so different from the book?
The reason that the Hobbit movies are so different from the books on which they are based is because they were directed and co-written by Peter Jackson and not J.R.R. Tolkien.
Are the LOTR movies good adaptations?
But is the trilogy a good film adaptation? For the most part, yes. The movies faithfully capture the story and characters of the novels. But they also leave out a lot of lore, and make some questionable story decisions that deviate from the novels in various problematic ways.
What is Peter Jackson’s favorite LOTR movie?
Speaking to Stephen Colbert on The Late Show with Stephen Colbert, Jackson was asked which was his favourite moment in the original trilogy. Jackson told Colbert one of the early scenes in the second film The Two Towers, which centred on Gollum was his favourite.
Are The Hobbit movies true to the books?
Many viewers may wonder how much J.R.R. Tolkien they are really getting in “The Hobbit: The Desolation of Smaug,” which opens today. The mere fact that Jackson’s film includes characters, elements, or events that are “not in the book,” therefore, doesn’t prove that the films are unfaithful to Tolkien’s vision.
How did Bilbo get Sting in the book?
Bilbo Baggins discovered Sting in the year TA 2941 in a Troll-hoard, and used it during the Quest of Erebor. He later passed it to his heir Frodo Baggins.
Are the LOTR movies better than the books?
Many people love the Lord of the Rings books and movies. Both versions of the story are much beloved by their fans. However, the movies are slightly better than the books, all because of the writing for one character. This character is a strong presence in all three movies and only makes the story better.
How true to the books is Lord of the Rings?
But they are not 100\% accurate and, though the original theatrical releases stretch to nearly 10 hours of screen time, the movies leave out an awful lot of Tolkien’s original story. Especially the conclusion that stretches nearly 100 pages past the destruction of the ring and the end of Sauron.
Are The Hobbit movies faithful to the book?
I think it’s reasonable to say that Peter Jackson’s “Hobbit” leaves out much of the detail of the book, and makes some notable changes, but is nonetheless very faithful to the plot; whereas the movie is also intended to enhance the visualization of Middle-earth that was achieved with “The Lord of the Rings”.
Was Sting a good sword?
Though just a dagger by standard of the Elves, Sting made a perfect short-sword for a Hobbit, although it was still rather small. Bilbo initially chose to wear it “inside his breeches” and was still able to travel and even run without any apparent inconvenience.
Does Bilbo’s sword have a name?
Sting is a large Elvish dagger in The Hobbit and The Lord of the Rings. It functioned well as a sword for the hobbits Bilbo and Frodo Baggins. Bilbo named the weapon after using it to fend off the giant spiders in Mirkwood forest, then later passed it on to Frodo to use in his quest to destroy the One Ring.
Is Peter Jackson’s ‘The Lord of the Rings’ The final movie?
Yes, we’re talking about Peter Jackson, the director whose final (?) venture to Middle-earth is one of 2014’s most eagerly awaited sequels — and whose filmography is about so, so much more than hobbits and orcs.
What is Peter Jackson’s top 10 best movies?
Peter Jackson’s 10 Best Movies 10. Bad Taste (1987) 68\% 9. Meet the Feebles (1989) 71\% 8. The Hobbit: The Desolation of Smaug (2013) 74\% 7. King Kong (2005) 84\% 6. Dead Alive (1992) 88\% 5. The Lord of the Rings: The Fellowship of the Ring (2001) 91\% 4. Heavenly Creatures (1994) 92\% 3. The Lord of the Rings: The Return of the King (2003) 93\%
Was Peter Jackson’s ‘The Hobbit’ a disappointment?
With 2012’s The Hobbit: An Unexpected Journey, Jackson found himself in a situation few filmmakers ever experience — namely, following up a movie that made more than a billion dollars worldwide but was still regarded as something of a disappointment.
Is the Lovely Bones the worst Peter Jackson movie ever?
While Saoirse Ronan and Stanley Tucci are both predictably excellent in the movie, The Lovely Bones is the worst example of what happens when Jackson lets his penchant for VFX take priority over the basic tenets of storytelling. Truthfully, it would be easy to group together all three of the Hobbit movies here and call it a day.