Does every effect has a cause?
Yes every effect must have a cause. But cause is not an effect. If it was then the cause is not real. The only cause is real and all effects are in real.
Can an effect precede its cause?
Cause comes before effect. Except when it doesn’t. Physicists have started to realise that causality might not be as straightforward as we thought. Instead of cause always preceding effect, effects can sometimes precipitate their causes.
Can an effect also be a cause?
An effect can in turn be a cause of, or causal factor for, many other effects, which all lie in its future. Some writers have held that causality is metaphysically prior to notions of time and space.
Can an effect only have one cause?
That is, more than one cause may be responsible for any given effect. Often it is not necessary, or even possible, to find the exact cause of an event or to name the exact effect. So, when formulating a thesis, you can claim one of a number of causes or effects to be the primary, or main, cause or effect.
What is necessary cause?
If someone says that A causes B: If A is necessary for B (necessary cause) that means you will never have B if you don’t have A. In other words, of one thing is a necessary cause of another, then that means that the outcome can never happen without the cause. However, sometimes the cause occurs without the outcome.
Is it necessary that there is a cause before an effect?
In order for the independent variable to cause the dependent variable, logic dictates that the independent variable must occur first in time; in short, the cause must come before the effect.
Can the future influence the present?
This idea that the future can influence the present, and that the present can influence the past, is known as retrocausality. It has been around for a while without ever catching on – and for good reason, because we never see effects happen before their causes in everyday life.
Does Causality exist?
Yes. Causality is order by definition; we therefore know it exists because we know that not all observations are the same.
What is necessary cause in epidemiology?
A component cause that must be present in every sufficient cause of a given outcome is referred to as a necessary cause. For example, HIV exposure is necessary for AIDS to occur, and TB exposure is necessary for TB infection to occur.
What are three types of causes?
This yields three types of causes: fixed states (non-modifiable), dynamic states (modifiable) and events (including actions).
What is an effect without a cause?
When effects are spontaneous and their cause irrelevant, in effect, what you have are effects without causes. Not because there are none, but because you need none. Put yourself in front of a television. What we have is a flat screen that comes to life with vibrant colors and matching sounds.
Does every action have a cause?
In the universe everything we know has a cause. Certain things are consistent throughout the universe. One of them is that every action has an equal and opposite reaction. The very essence of everything, matter, has anti matter that cancels it out.
What is the definition of cause and effect in physics?
There is no such thing as “cause” and “effect” in fundamental laws of physics. It is a human concept, which can be defined as follows: If whenever you see a situation with property A, you later see a situation with property B, regardless of any other factors, you say “A causes B”. That’s the definition.
Could the world have come into being without first cause?
To simply state that “there is no reason why the world could not have come into being without first cause” without defending this assertion is an inadequate argument against the notion of the Prime Mover. My question is very simple: Is it, as Russell seems to imply, possible for something to have no cause and why?